NAERIDE

You can’t be tolerant with the intolerant. If you said this sentence, you may be intolerance too; have you ever thought about it?
I’ve heard Nazis talk during my entire life, and I was thinking: If Nazis can speak, then everyone can. I understood that it’s necessary that everyone can express their absurd and violent ideas to preserve mine.

You don’t believe in freedom—a good part of you, at least. Believing in it means a constant sacrifice, which means allowing everyone to speak, even the violent side. It requires huge self-control and strength. The majority couldn’t bear this pain, so this word is getting away from it, and they don’t even realize what they’re losing due to this bad attitude to accuse and delete. This reality is wandering thought sort of made-up meadows bliss and, with the vehicle of misleading conviction to be better than every opposite point of view, leads us to the death of the doctrine of freedom. I had always been seeing the greatest human being’s success melt before, but now the phenomenon is clearer than ever. The people settled in my land have lived in peace and freedom for so long, from eighty years by now, that they are forgetting the principles on which this Europe has been developed. And I’m not speaking from the perspective of a conservative man; I don’t care. I’m telling you that there doesn’t exist a right and free alternative to this model. There’s no future to treat other human beings like rejected creatures, regardless of how evil they may be. This behavior, this uninterrupted way to show superiority and hubris, runs opposite everything that binds to the right to be free to speak, and it may choke a truly free society to turn it into a forlorn life.

You don’t have a duty to hear absurd beliefs, but you must let them expose themselves; the survival of the free system is at stake, and we had been losing the match before, and now we’re diving into the jaws of hypocrisy. A censorship movement caused other censorship movements, and this might hand our ideas in to the oppression. If you want to preserve your dignity, let the damned live too and discredit them with facts, not with censorship as if they were your own ideas.

THE RIGHT TO BELIEVE IN BULLSHIT
Unscientific thoughts can be easily denied, as can intolerance and insults, but treating them as abnormal concepts is a mistake, a particularly grave mistake. The real world is various and complicated; this hubris has given rise to further intolerance; have you noticed it? Less moderation might mean death. The right to believe in bullshit is breath for a feeble and wounded society.
You can’t speak because you’re dangerous; you’re unscientific.
Think about how dangerous this is. Science doesn’t need your help to preserve itself; it is strong enough, and it will convince the honest people worldwide, but there’s also irrationality, and you must accept it. Nietzsche said you cannot fit reality into rigid and logical schemes; that’s not how it works, and this is still true today. This raw nature changes slowly, and we are slightly puzzled about it, are we? We have been too occupied questioning ourselves; it is leading us to death.

The public discussion on free speech has reached a point in Western history where we were able to pour edgily our ideas out and, in the meantime, to respect each other, but now? The human beings haven’t found another better way to rely on one another, like total freedom, but this mediocre population is living the risk to screw all up. Why? We’re stuck in a skeptical position. We’re motionless due to the corruption of the concept. The Europeans aren’t preserving their successes, they are failing due to arrogance. They dabble in the philosophy of human freedom, but did they forget the bases of this? A large majority believes in their superiority but has hidden it behind confusing discussions of good manners.

WHY HAS THE FUTURE FALLEN IN THE HARM OF EXTREMIST?
Because you didn’t fight them with topics, literature, ideas, and facts, but with censorship and intolerance, and now the roles have been reversed.
A large part of us has been fighting that abysmal monster through suppression, impositions and lies.
The freedom is for everyone or for Nobody. Can you devise an alternative? If you can, propose; if you can’t, then give in and descend from your throne. Don’t hush them up if you don’t want to turn into your enemies and give them the power.
You could ask: Where’s the violation? It is in law, in the gestures, not in your opinion, not in your ideas, not in other words. The violation is where your freedom caused serious harm to mine, nothing more. Please go back to believing in total freedom, the greatest belief of all.